The analysis shows that if between 40 and 80 Earth-like exoplanets are examined and none display signs of life, scientists could confidently assert that fewer than 10 to 20 percent of similar worlds are likely to be inhabited. In cosmic terms, even that low percentage translates to roughly 10 billion life-hosting planets in the Milky Way. Thus, even a perfect null result would mark significant progress in constraining the prevalence of extraterrestrial life.

Yet such conclusions are only as reliable as the quality of the data. Every observation carries uncertainties that must be carefully considered. Some planets may possess life but evade detection due to weak or ambiguous biosignatures-these are interpretation uncertainties. Others may skew the statistics if they fail to meet baseline criteria for life-bearing conditions, introducing sample uncertainty. Such issues underscore the need for methodological rigor.

"It's not just about how many planets we observe - it's about asking the right questions and how confident we can be in seeing or not seeing what we're searching for," explained Angerhausen. "If we're not careful and are overconfident in our abilities to identify life, even a large survey could lead to misleading results."

These concerns are especially relevant to missions like the Large Interferometer for Exoplanets (LIFE), spearheaded by ETH Zurich. LIFE aims to examine dozens of planets comparable to Earth in size and temperature, with the goal of detecting water, oxygen, and complex chemical markers of biology in their atmospheres. According to the study, the mission's planned survey size appears sufficient to draw statistically robust conclusions about the abundance of life in the galaxy.

The team emphasizes that meaningful results depend not only on powerful instruments, but also on framing precise scientific questions. They argue that specific, quantifiable questions-such as the percentage of rocky planets in habitable zones exhibiting water vapor, oxygen, and methane-yield more useful data than vague inquiries about how many planets "have life."

The researchers also explored how previous assumptions, known as priors in Bayesian statistics, influence outcomes. They compared this with a Frequentist approach, which omits such priors. Their results showed that for sample sizes expected from missions like LIFE, the impact of priors is minimal, and both methods produce comparable insights.

"In applied science, Bayesian and Frequentist statistics are sometimes interpreted as two competing schools of thought. As a statistician, I like to treat them as alternative and complementary ways to understand the world and interpret probabilities," said co-author Emily Garvin, a PhD student in the Quanz group. Garvin's contribution focused on the Frequentist methods that confirmed the study's broader findings. "Slight variations in a survey's scientific goals may require different statistical methods to provide a reliable and precise answer," she noted. "We wanted to show how distinct approaches provide a complementary understanding of the same dataset, and in this way present a roadmap for adopting different frameworks."

Ultimately, the study highlights how a well-designed survey, even if it finds no signs of life, can significantly deepen our understanding of life's distribution across the universe. "A single positive detection would change everything," Angerhausen stated. "But even if we don't find life, we'll be able to quantify how rare - or common - planets with detectable biosignatures really might be."

Research Report:What if We Find Nothing? Bayesian Analysis of the Statistical Information of Null Results in Future Exoplanet Habitability and Biosignature Surveys

Related Links
ETH Zurich
Lands Beyond Beyond - extra solar planets - news and science
Life Beyond Earth